Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Advice results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Pessimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 871 hits. Analysis detected 3,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,468 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,448 of 16,562 topics). This Legal Advice is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Legal Advice
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,468
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 19.5%19.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos