Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lebanon University Strike results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 1,336 hits. Analysis detected 6,047 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,370 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,070 of 16,562 topics). This Lebanon University Strike is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Lebanon University Strike

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 12.5%12.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 30.6%30.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.1%16.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 30.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos