Topic summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video1,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lawsuit Texas Tech Teaching Directives Dei results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 389 hits. Analysis detected 2,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,345 of 16,562 topics). This Lawsuit Texas Tech Teaching Directives Dei is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group.
Lawsuit Texas Tech Teaching Directives Dei
Topic details
Total words: 4,020
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos