Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lawrence Kansas results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 387 hits. Analysis detected 3,126 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,841 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,008 of 16,562 topics). This Lawrence Kansas is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Lawrence Kansas
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,841
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.8% percentile
4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.6%13.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.8%10.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos