Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lawrence results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 202 hits. Analysis detected 1,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,430 of 16,562 topics). This Lawrence is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Lawrence
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos