Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Late Night Show results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 360 hits . Analysis detected 1,577 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,908 of 16,562 topics). This Late Night Show is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group. Late Night Show
Topic details
Total words: 1,884
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.3% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 19.1% 19.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Tu Quoque: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst