Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Large Language Models results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 841 hits. Analysis detected 8,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,742 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,817 of 16,346 topics). This Large Language Models is better (less manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Large Language Models
Topic details
Total words: 7,742
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.8% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.4%10.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos