Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lando Norris results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 807 hits. Analysis detected 4,265 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,621 of 16,562 topics). This Lando Norris is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Lando Norris
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,320
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.4%10.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.2%15.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos