Topic summary
⁠78%2 analyzed articles/videos890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Landlord Tenant Law results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 562 hits. Analysis detected 4,234 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,025 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,163 of 16,562 topics). This Landlord Tenant Law is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Landlord Tenant Law
Topic details
Total words: 5,025
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Special Pleading: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos