Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,451 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laguardia Airport results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 558 hits. Analysis detected 3,708 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,897 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (15,394 of 16,562 topics). This Laguardia Airport is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
Laguardia Airport
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751007.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos