Topic summary
⁠82%2 analyzed articles/videos145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labour Leadership results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 790 hits. Analysis detected 5,601 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,455 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,973 of 16,562 topics). This Labour Leadership is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Labour Leadership
Topic details
Total words: 5,455
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.5%14.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos