Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Piper results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 53.8% saturation with 312 hits. Analysis detected 1,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.8% and a BS Rank of 98% (189 of 6,628 authors). This Elizabeth Piper is worse (more manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Piper
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
98%Elizabeth Piper (selected)14%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 580
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

97% percentile
025507510097.2% percentile
13.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles580 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 53.8%53.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 39.8%39.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 17.8%17.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.8%8.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 7.2%7.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 32.6%32.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.0%4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Author 53.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 39.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 32.6%, sitewide 26.9%Recency Bias: Author 17.8%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 10.7%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos