Topic summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video1,257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Theory Of Value results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Begging the Question, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 984 hits. Analysis detected 4,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,600 of 16,562 topics). This Labor Theory Of Value is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Labor Theory Of Value
Topic details
Total words: 5,028
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 19.6%19.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos