Author summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 1,257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Branko Milanovic results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Begging the Question , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 984 hits . Analysis detected 4,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,764 of 6,363 authors). This Branko Milanovic is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group. Branko Milanovic
Author details
Total words: 5,028
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 19.6% 19.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 7.0% 7.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 19.6%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst