Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video591 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Policy results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 698 hits. Analysis detected 2,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (4,903 of 16,562 topics). This Labor Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Labor Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,364
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.4% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.5%29.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos