Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Party results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,389 hits. Analysis detected 10,705 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,447 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,476 of 16,562 topics). This Labor Party is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Labor Party
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,447
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos