Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,080 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Negotiations results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 1,377 hits. Analysis detected 11,850 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,165 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,667 of 16,562 topics). This Labor Negotiations is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
Labor Negotiations
Topic details
Total words: 11,165
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos