Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Labor Economics results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 572 hits. Analysis detected 4,259 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,303 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,689 topics). This Labor Economics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Labor Economics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,303
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.3%17.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos