Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Crisis results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 446 hits. Analysis detected 3,735 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,890 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,753 of 16,562 topics). This Labor Crisis is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Labor Crisis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,890
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510083.4% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.6%23.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 15.0%15.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.7%7.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.0%13.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 15.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos