Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video609 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor & Workforce results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 48.5% saturation with 886 hits. Analysis detected 3,432 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,827 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,801 of 16,562 topics). This Labor & Workforce is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Labor & Workforce
Topic details
Total words: 1,827
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.1% percentile
8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 48.5%48.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.3%12.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.6%9.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.4%13.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 48.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Bandwagon: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos