Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor And Employment results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 1,952 hits. Analysis detected 11,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,270 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,986 of 16,558 topics). This Labor And Employment is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Labor And Employment
Topic details
Total words: 10,270
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos