Topic summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kylian Mbappes Charitable Donations results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 1,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,781 of 16,558 topics). This Kylian Mbappes Charitable Donations is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Kylian Mbappes Charitable Donations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠60%Kylian Mbappes Charitable Donations (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,036
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.8%11.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos