Topic summary
⁠47%4 analyzed articles/videos2,215 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyiv results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,055 hits. Analysis detected 7,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,954 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,602 of 16,097 topics). This Kyiv is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Kyiv
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,954
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos