Topic summary
⁠15%2 analyzed articles/videos2,860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kratom results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 914 hits. Analysis detected 5,972 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,440 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (15,086 of 16,118 topics). This Kratom is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group.
Kratom
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,440
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751006.4% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos