Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kqed Podcasts results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 60 faulty-reasoning hits from 212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,450 of 16,562 topics). This Kqed Podcasts is worse (more manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group.
Kqed Podcasts
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510091.3% percentile
9.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles212 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos