Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Knicks Finals results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 879 faulty-reasoning hits from 984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 15,414 topics). This Knicks Finals is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Knicks Finals
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 0%Alameda County1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%Knicks Finals (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 984
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles984 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.2%24.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos