Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kitchen Gadgets results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 707 hits. Analysis detected 3,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,953 of 16,562 topics). This Kitchen Gadgets is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Kitchen Gadgets
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.1% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 22.5%22.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 18.1%18.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos