Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,053 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kentucky Derby results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Recency Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 5,124 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,007 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,703 of 16,562 topics). This Kentucky Derby is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Kentucky Derby
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,007
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.8%7.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos