Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keith Haring Collection results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Anchoring Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 486 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,815 of 16,562 topics). This Keith Haring Collection is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Keith Haring Collection
Topic details
Total words: 1,588
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.8%4.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos