Gothamist77%

Rarely seen Keith Haring works now on display in NYC 1%

By Hannah Frishberg0%

5/2/2026, 2:00:46 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 0 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 0 faulty-reasoning hits from 397 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 1% (21,819 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the article peer group.

An exhibition of Keith Haring's art, largely unseen for decades, is going on display at Sotheby’s this May. 
The deeply personal works by the late artist come from the private collection of his lifelong best friend, Kermit Oswald. 
They include one of just six known canvas self-portraits ever done by Haring, a dresser Haring painted for Oswald’s son (Haring’s godson), and a crib that Haring painted and was used by all four of Oswald’s children. 
Many of the pieces have been in Oswald’s private collection since Haring gifted them to him in the 1970s and ’80s, sometimes after creating them in Oswald’s home, with Oswald at his side. 
“I can’t separate that memory from what the painting or drawing is,” said Oswald in a phone interview. 
“For me, the drawing is the afternoon we spent together doing it, the laughter and everything else that went along with it." 
Haring and Oswald grew up two-and-a-half blocks from each other in Kutztown, Pennsylvania. 
They attended kindergarten, middle and high school together and early on recognized their shared interest in art. 
“That really bonded us together” and gave them both someone to bounce ideas off of and draw with, Oswald said. 
“We didn’t have to go looking for each other. 
We were already there.” 
That bond continued through adulthood, with Oswald collaborating with Haring on the fabrication of his sculptures and wood reliefs. 
Haring would also often gift Oswald and his wife Lisa work, resulting in them having one of the world's most significant collections of Haring's works when he died from AIDS-related complications in 1990, at age 31. 
“We didn’t have a wall that didn’t have a Haring anywhere in the house, on three floors, said Oswald. 
“They were everywhere.” 
He said he doesn’t regret parting with a portion of the works. 
“I’m happy to have them out in the world, where other people can hopefully establish their own connection and relationship to them.” 
Oswald still retains other works by Haring  and he and his wife are always finding more stashed away in long-unopened books, drawers and flat files. 
“We’ve been finding Harings for 50 years in our own home,” he laughed. 
“It’s like a treasure hunt.” 
“Haring’s House: Works From The Collection of Kermit Oswald” will be on display at the Breuer (945 Madison Ave.) 
May 2-13. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.6%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 3.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 5.2%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 1.7%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 14.4%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.4%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 5.9%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 5.5%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.4%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 4.3%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 6.6%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.8%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 5.2%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 7.0%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.9%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 6.8%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 6.5%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 9.6%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.2%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 6.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

397 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker34%attributed speech262writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageKermit Oswald • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKermit Oswald • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageKermit Oswald • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKermit Oswald • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKermit Oswald • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageKermit Oswald • 19 words • 0.0% coverageKermit Oswald • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKermit Oswald • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageKermit Oswald • 13 words • 0.0% coverageKermit Oswald • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kermit Oswald

0%flagged-word coverage
135 attributed words100% of attributed speech0% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.