Topic summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas Elections results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,232 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,367 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,692 of 16,562 topics). This Kansas Elections is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Kansas Elections
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,367
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos