Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Events results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,286 hits. Analysis detected 4,717 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,508 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,180 of 15,780 topics). This Kansas City Events is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Kansas City Events
Topic details
Total words: 7,508
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 17.1%17.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos