Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Culture results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 1,081 hits. Analysis detected 4,794 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,111 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,041 of 16,562 topics). This Kansas City Culture is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Kansas City Culture
Topic details
Total words: 5,111
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.5% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 21.1%21.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.0%9.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos