Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judiciary Committee results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 45.2% saturation with 312 hits. Analysis detected 1,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 690 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (722 of 16,562 topics). This Judiciary Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Judiciary Committee
Topic details
Total words: 690
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510095.6% percentile
13.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles690 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 45.2%45.2%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 16.2%16.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 29.1%29.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 16.2%16.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.7%29.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 10.6%10.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.2%14.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.9%12.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 45.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 29.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 11.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos