Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video897 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Politics results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 49.7% saturation with 1,783 hits. Analysis detected 11,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,451 of 16,562 topics). This Judicial Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group.
Judicial Politics
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠92%Judicial Politics (selected)10%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,588
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510091.2% percentile
9.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 49.7%49.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 28.7%28.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 40.9%40.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 26.9%26.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 19.0%19.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 12.3%12.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 49.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 40.9%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 28.7%, sitewide 2.0%Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 26.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Straw Man: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Horn Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos