Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video4,169 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Philosophy results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 2,897 hits. Analysis detected 16,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,505 of 16,562 topics). This Judicial Philosophy is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Judicial Philosophy
Topic details
Total words: 16,676
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles16.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.4%17.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos