Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Misconduct results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 45.5% saturation with 658 hits. Analysis detected 2,921 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,445 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 85% (2,505 of 16,562 topics). This Judicial Misconduct is worse (more manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
Judicial Misconduct
Topic details
Total words: 1,445
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.9% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 45.5%45.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 23.7%23.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.2%13.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 5.9%5.9%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 45.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.7%Special Pleading: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos