Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Interpretation results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 1,078 hits. Analysis detected 8,613 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,952 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,489 of 16,243 topics). This Judicial Interpretation is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Judicial Interpretation
Topic details
Total words: 5,952
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.1% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.1%18.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.8%9.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos