Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video874 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial History results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 251 hits. Analysis detected 2,240 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,622 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (9,048 of 16,562 topics). This Judicial History is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Judicial History
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,622
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos