Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 82 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Appointments And Nominations results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 81 hits . Analysis detected 391 faulty-reasoning hits from 328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,887 of 16,562 topics). This Judicial Appointments And Nominations is worse (more manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group. Judicial Appointments And Nominations
Topic details
Total words: 328
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.6% percentile 7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles328 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 24.7% 24.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst