Topic summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joshua Kushner results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 375 hits. Analysis detected 2,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (4,863 of 22,543 topics). This Joshua Kushner is worse (more manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Joshua Kushner
Topic details
Total words: 1,876
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510078.4% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.4%16.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.0%20.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.5%12.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.0%Red Herring: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos