Of course a Miami man is at the center of FIFA's sellout scandal 65%

By B. Scott McLendon74%

7/29/2026, 10:35:35 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 974 faulty-reasoning hits from 469 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.1% and a BS Rank of 65% (9,771 of 27,714 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the article peer group.

It’s not often the internet agrees on anything. 
But after FIFA floated a plan to sell $20 billion in ownership stakes, soccer fans around the world have united in outrage  especially over one name reportedly being considered to buy in: Miami billionaire Joshua Kushner. 
The proposal has left fans baffled. 
FIFA is technically a nonprofit under Swiss law, yet it’s exploring a deal that would allow outside investors to purchase stakes in soccer's governing body as if it were a publicly traded company. 
And because all (scandalous) roads lead to Miami, of course, FIFA named billionaire resident Kushner's holding company, Thrive Eternal, as the one “expected to lead the proposed investor group,” according to the organization. 
FIFA argues that the move would help fund soccer's growth in underserved areas of the world. 
Critics argue the implementation would veer the sport toward the whims of the world’s elite and siphon power away from the working-class people who represent the overwhelming majority of soccer fans. 
“Football is the world’s most popular sport and an extraordinary engine of human and social development,” FIFA President Gianni Infantino said in a statement. 
“Parts of the game have turned that popularity into remarkable commercial value  and we celebrate that success and want it to continue, because it lifts the whole game. 
“Our job is to make sure the rest of football grows with it: FIFA exists to support sustainable, inclusive development in every corner of the world.” 
The backlash was immediate from the rest of the soccer world, with other major organizations, such as Europe's continental soccer authority, the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), mulling plans for European teams to boycott the 2030 FIFA World Cup if the organization goes through with the proposal, according to ESPN. 
Who is Joshua Kushner, the Miami man behind FIFA’s sellout plan? 
Kushner, like his more famous older brother Jared, is a businessman and investor. 
While the Kushner family's prominence began with his grandfather's real estate empire, the family became a household name during President Donald Trump's first term thanks to Jared (Trump’s son-in-law) and his involvement in the administration. 
Joshua Kushner's main claim to fame (if you exclude his family ties and marriage to supermodel Karlie Kloss) is his investment company Thrive Capital. 
The billion-dollar company, of which Thrive Eternal is an arm, invested about $1 billion in Sam Altman's OpenAI. 
In 2020, Kushner and Kloss bought a $23.5 million home on North Bay Road, which The Wall Street Journal dubbed “Miami's Richest Road.” 
About five years later, he made another sizable Miami purchase, buying a reported minority stake in the Miami Heat (a team Forbes valued at about $5.7 billion at the time). 
Kushner didn’t respond to a request for comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 3.5%Miami New Times: 1.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%B. Scott McLendon: 1.5%Miami New Times: 0.9%Anchoring Bias9.4%This article: 7.2%B. Scott McLendon: 2.6%Miami New Times: 2.1%Availability Heuristic7.2%This article: 2.8%B. Scott McLendon: 1.1%Miami New Times: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic2.8%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.3%Miami New Times: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%B. Scott McLendon: 10.0%Miami New Times: 3.6%Framing Effect2.8%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%B. Scott McLendon: 2.3%Miami New Times: 1.4%Optimism Bias5.5%This article: 6.6%B. Scott McLendon: 1.3%Miami New Times: 0.8%Pessimism Bias6.6%This article: 24.1%B. Scott McLendon: 14.3%Miami New Times: 7.3%Negativity Bias24.1%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.4%Miami New Times: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%B. Scott McLendon: 0.6%Miami New Times: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error1.7%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 1.6%Miami New Times: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%B. Scott McLendon: 3.3%Miami New Times: 2.7%Halo Effect5.1%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 2.6%Miami New Times: 1.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.9%B. Scott McLendon: 1.3%Miami New Times: 0.8%Recency Bias10.9%This article: 7.5%B. Scott McLendon: 1.1%Miami New Times: 0.4%Primacy Effect7.5%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%B. Scott McLendon: 4.7%Miami New Times: 1.5%Ad Hominem12.4%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.1%B. Scott McLendon: 1.0%Miami New Times: 2.2%Appeal to Authority5.1%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.5%Miami New Times: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 6.6%B. Scott McLendon: 0.5%Miami New Times: 0.4%Slippery Slope6.6%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.4%B. Scott McLendon: 2.3%Miami New Times: 1.6%Hasty Generalization6.4%This article: 9.4%B. Scott McLendon: 1.8%Miami New Times: 0.6%Red Herring9.4%This article: 18.8%B. Scott McLendon: 2.9%Miami New Times: 1.0%Bandwagon18.8%This article: 17.7%B. Scott McLendon: 5.7%Miami New Times: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion17.7%This article: 2.8%B. Scott McLendon: 1.0%Miami New Times: 0.3%Begging the Question2.8%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 1.1%Miami New Times: 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 10.9%B. Scott McLendon: 3.1%Miami New Times: 1.2%Burden of Proof10.9%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.3%B. Scott McLendon: 1.3%Miami New Times: 4.0%Anecdotal11.3%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.2%Miami New Times: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 1.7%Miami New Times: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.1%B. Scott McLendon: 3.2%Miami New Times: 3.0%Unattributed Quote5.1%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.6%Miami New Times: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 17.7%B. Scott McLendon: 11.0%Miami New Times: 5.3%Biased Writer Voice17.7%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 1.6%Miami New Times: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 1.2%Miami New Times: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%B. Scott McLendon: 0.0%Miami New Times: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

469 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker17%attributed speech390writer words
Selected voice

Gianni Infantino

63%flagged-word coverage
79 attributed words100% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Unattributed Quote+30.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Gianni Infantino: 30.4%30.4%Biased Writer Voice-21.3 ptsWriter: 21.3%Gianni Infantino: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.