Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,271 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joshua Jackson results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 933 hits. Analysis detected 2,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,467 of 16,562 topics). This Joshua Jackson is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Joshua Jackson
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,084
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos