Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,019 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Safdie results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 826 hits. Analysis detected 3,895 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,057 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,546 of 16,562 topics). This Josh Safdie is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.
Josh Safdie
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,057
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.5% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 27.0%27.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.6%8.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Topic 27.0%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Horn Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos