Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jorge R Gutierrez results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 729 hits. Analysis detected 4,536 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (11,829 of 15,361 topics). This Jorge R Gutierrez is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Jorge R Gutierrez
Topic details
Total words: 7,040
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos