Topic summary
⁠44%3 analyzed articles/videos1,397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Ossoff results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,869 hits. Analysis detected 12,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,090 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,141 of 16,562 topics). This Jon Ossoff is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Jon Ossoff
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos