Topic summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Ratcliffe results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 193 hits . Analysis detected 1,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,395 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 74% (4,336 of 16,559 topics). This John Ratcliffe is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. John Ratcliffe
Topic details
Total words: 1,395
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.8% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Bandwagon: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.6% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst