Topic summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joel Embiid results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 145 hits. Analysis detected 1,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,890 of 16,562 topics). This Joel Embiid is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Joel Embiid
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,044
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.9%13.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.3%12.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos