Topic summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video425 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Jordan results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 2,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,275 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,886 of 16,562 topics). This Jim Jordan is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Jim Jordan
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,275
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.6% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 12.6%12.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.6%8.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.5%14.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.8%14.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 23.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.2%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos