Topic summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video1,191 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Cramer results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 512 hits. Analysis detected 2,985 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,573 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,474 of 16,562 topics). This Jim Cramer is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Jim Cramer
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,573
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos